Quick Links

• Our Review Method

• Is MCH Investment Strategies Scam or Legit Broker?

• What is MCH Investment Strategies?

• Pros

• Cons

• Conclusion

Our Review Method ▲

In our rigorous review process, a team of seasoned financial specialists, boasting more than 20 years of experience in Forex trading, carries out an exhaustive evaluation of various trading services. Our team delves deep into the investigation of fees, assesses the trading platforms, and verifies adherence to regulatory standards. We also interact directly with customer support and conduct actual trades to gain a real-world understanding of the trading conditions. This comprehensive approach enables us to provide informed insights and advice on why we recommend avoiding MCH Investment Strategies due to the issues we've identified.

Is MCH Investment Strategies Scam or Legit Broker? ▲

Trading with MCH Investment Strategies is not recommended due to the lack of regulatory oversight. The firm asserts its operations are based in London, UK, yet it has not obtained the necessary regulation from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), a critical requirement for brokerage entities within the UK. This absence of regulation suggests that engaging in trading activities with MCH Investment Strategies could potentially expose traders' investments to undue risk. We strongly urge traders to opt for brokers who adhere to the regulatory frameworks established by reputable financial authorities, such as the FCA in the UK or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in Australia, to safeguard against potential financial misconduct.

What is MCH Investment Strategies? ▲

MCH Investment Strategies operates as a broker in the realms of Forex, Contracts for Difference (CFDs), and cryptocurrency trading. The organization does not disclose significant details regarding its operational background or regulatory compliance, which raises concerns. The confusion escalates when the terms and conditions reference unrelated entities, such as "HexaBank is the trading name of Partner Communication LTD" and regulations under the "Activities Regulated Markets Law of 2007 (Law 144(I)/2007)" via a different website. Additionally, the Spanish regulatory authority, CNMV, has issued a warning against MCH Investment Strategies for operating without authorization to provide certain investment services. This lack of transparency and regulatory compliance further underscores the risks associated with trading through MCH Investment Strategies.

Pros ▲

• There are no discernible advantages to trading with MCH Investment Strategies due to the significant regulatory concerns and operational uncertainties highlighted.

Cons ▲

• MCH Investment Strategies lacks regulatory approval from the FCA, a fundamental requirement for financial service providers in the UK.

• The broker's connection to entities and services not directly related to its operations introduces confusion and raises questions about its legitimacy.

• The Spanish regulator CNMV's warning against MCH Investment Strategies indicates a lack of authorization to offer investment services, adding to the risks of engaging with them.

• The absence of detailed information about the company’s background and regulatory status makes it difficult to trust the safety of funds and personal information.

Conclusion ▲

Our extensive review strongly suggests that traders should steer clear of MCH Investment Strategies. The absence of regulation by the FCA, alongside warnings from other regulatory bodies such as Spain's CNMV, highlight the potential risks of financial fraud and other malpractices. The lack of transparency regarding the company’s operational and regulatory background further exacerbates these concerns. It is imperative for traders seeking to protect their investments to choose brokers that are regulated by reputable financial authorities, ensuring a higher level of security and regulatory oversight. Therefore, we advise against engaging with MCH Investment Strategies and recommend vigilance against any proposals from them, especially given the recent inactivity of their website.